Tapsearch Com EditorHistory of the Global Economic Arena
October 21st 2011 19:20
Bizarre Politics Reports:
Who said we had to compete in a global economic arena with one another for the same jobs? Someone please tell us.
Nothing is matching up.
Nothing is matching up.
Ref - Free Trade is cancer from Politico. Com
Someone please tell us. Who said we had to compete like this for the same jobs in a global economic arena?
We do not need any conspiracy theories to know that free trade and globalization have not evolved in any natural economic fashion but have been driven by powerful forces outside the will of the people. It is obvious that workers have had no say in the matter. If free trade agreements had been to be ratified by a popular vote, how many workers would have voted for them?
Ref.: Politico Com
Subject: Free trade is economic cancer. Can not leave it out of Wall Street protests
Content: Our article - Can not leave free trade out of the Occupy Wall Street protest is making the rounds on the worldwide web . See our latest updates with our editorial cartoons added at the end of the article at Free trade cancer spreds or search under the article title above.
We have been advocates for workers dignity, fair trade and local value added economies since 1992 and online since 1998. We keep asking who says we have to compete in a global economic arena with each other for the same jobs. We have been asking this since we read an article about the Maquiladora factory program in a techology magazine in 1992. It told how the U.S. Federal Government sponsored the moving of factories outside of the U.S. starting in 1956. This was the same year the Suez Canal crisis exposed a serious money crisis in the world with England in the center of the crisis. In effect, this was the year money values were globalized. The globalization of money came first. The moving of factories outside of the U.S. corresponded with this happening.
It was supposed to be just a temporary program to test the waters but it never ended and it evolved into what is called free trade. Free trade is not really trade as historically defined and practiced. It is primarily about making production portable , separating production from a money system that was set up to make money a product all its own. The idea was to make debtor nations exporting nations where they could at least pay interest on loans on a perpetual basis. At the same time, the process would provide cheaper consumer goods for Americans. Consumerism was to be the pillars to support the system. However, apparently the powers to be did not take into consideration of what happens when workers start shopping their way out of their jobs.
In the end , the value of workers and labor have been deflated and devalued. We probably will never know what the amount of this loss value and how it knocked the pillars away that supports free trade. Now our economies based on making money on money instead of making things are burning out. President Bush and President Obama bailed out the big money interests behind the process and put them back in charge. However, the value of labor and workers is a real asset and perhaps a even a better money standard than any paper money standard we have today. The balance of trade has been affected in more ways than one with an unknown loss of trillions of dollars due to the deflation and devaluation of labor and workers. Now nations find they can no longer afford to provide the services that supplement the voids left in the transaction of Capitalism. This is the result of smashing the original free enterprise system into pieces. It is 1937 all over again. It is when President Roosevelt realized that the stimulus packages and bail outs were not enough to resolve the depression, He said he would not let the lack of dollars stand his his way and he instigated the Lend Lease program to send goods to our allies without worrying about being paid first. This ramped up our industrial base and then World War 2 came and grew the most awesome industrial might the world has ever known. In effect, President Roosevelt bought us about 100 years to get our economic life in order. However it is 1937 all over again with one exception. Our industrial base is gone. It has been shredded into pieces and scattered all over the globe. This is the core of our economic crisis and the surge of wars with nations finding they must protect their interests all over the globe.
So it all comes down to this question. Who said we had to compete like this with one another for the same jobs down to the lowest comon denominator of wage slave and even child labor. It is obivous that free trade and globalization have not evolved in any natural fashion but have been driven by powerful forces outside the will of the people. What if all the free trade agreements had to be ratified by a popular vote? How many workers would vote for it? This is the bottom line. It is time for our leaders to tell us what, why, where, how etc , they let this happen.
For thousands of resources and references search under tapsearch.com, tapart news, ray tapajna, tapsearcher, tapajna toonpool and/or tapajna wall street. Main original sites at Tapart Real World News Real Tax Reform - 3-6 Taps instead of taxes
Someone please tell us. Who said we had to compete like this for the same jobs in a global economic arena?
We do not need any conspiracy theories to know that free trade and globalization have not evolved in any natural economic fashion but have been driven by powerful forces outside the will of the people. It is obvious that workers have had no say in the matter. If free trade agreements had been to be ratified by a popular vote, how many workers would have voted for them?
Ref.: Politico Com
Subject: Free trade is economic cancer. Can not leave it out of Wall Street protests
Content: Our article - Can not leave free trade out of the Occupy Wall Street protest is making the rounds on the worldwide web . See our latest updates with our editorial cartoons added at the end of the article at Free trade cancer spreds or search under the article title above.
We have been advocates for workers dignity, fair trade and local value added economies since 1992 and online since 1998. We keep asking who says we have to compete in a global economic arena with each other for the same jobs. We have been asking this since we read an article about the Maquiladora factory program in a techology magazine in 1992. It told how the U.S. Federal Government sponsored the moving of factories outside of the U.S. starting in 1956. This was the same year the Suez Canal crisis exposed a serious money crisis in the world with England in the center of the crisis. In effect, this was the year money values were globalized. The globalization of money came first. The moving of factories outside of the U.S. corresponded with this happening.
It was supposed to be just a temporary program to test the waters but it never ended and it evolved into what is called free trade. Free trade is not really trade as historically defined and practiced. It is primarily about making production portable , separating production from a money system that was set up to make money a product all its own. The idea was to make debtor nations exporting nations where they could at least pay interest on loans on a perpetual basis. At the same time, the process would provide cheaper consumer goods for Americans. Consumerism was to be the pillars to support the system. However, apparently the powers to be did not take into consideration of what happens when workers start shopping their way out of their jobs.
In the end , the value of workers and labor have been deflated and devalued. We probably will never know what the amount of this loss value and how it knocked the pillars away that supports free trade. Now our economies based on making money on money instead of making things are burning out. President Bush and President Obama bailed out the big money interests behind the process and put them back in charge. However, the value of labor and workers is a real asset and perhaps a even a better money standard than any paper money standard we have today. The balance of trade has been affected in more ways than one with an unknown loss of trillions of dollars due to the deflation and devaluation of labor and workers. Now nations find they can no longer afford to provide the services that supplement the voids left in the transaction of Capitalism. This is the result of smashing the original free enterprise system into pieces. It is 1937 all over again. It is when President Roosevelt realized that the stimulus packages and bail outs were not enough to resolve the depression, He said he would not let the lack of dollars stand his his way and he instigated the Lend Lease program to send goods to our allies without worrying about being paid first. This ramped up our industrial base and then World War 2 came and grew the most awesome industrial might the world has ever known. In effect, President Roosevelt bought us about 100 years to get our economic life in order. However it is 1937 all over again with one exception. Our industrial base is gone. It has been shredded into pieces and scattered all over the globe. This is the core of our economic crisis and the surge of wars with nations finding they must protect their interests all over the globe.
So it all comes down to this question. Who said we had to compete like this with one another for the same jobs down to the lowest comon denominator of wage slave and even child labor. It is obivous that free trade and globalization have not evolved in any natural fashion but have been driven by powerful forces outside the will of the people. What if all the free trade agreements had to be ratified by a popular vote? How many workers would vote for it? This is the bottom line. It is time for our leaders to tell us what, why, where, how etc , they let this happen.
For thousands of resources and references search under tapsearch.com, tapart news, ray tapajna, tapsearcher, tapajna toonpool and/or tapajna wall street. Main original sites at Tapart Real World News Real Tax Reform - 3-6 Taps instead of taxes
| 31 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
subscribe to this blog
