Tapsearch Com EditorNew World Order or New World Dis-Order (LINK)
November 10th 2007 20:18
The New World Dis-Order where Workers' Dignity is attacked
The elder President Bush was the first to use the term "New World Order" in recent times.
The term was used after World War One relating to the League of Nations. After the failures of the League of Nations, the term faded away for awhile. In the 1950s. it was used again in discussions about the post-World War Two era. It mostly related to finding ways for nations to live peacefully with one another. Most people believed it was just a convenient label for finding a balance of power between nations.
When the first President Bush start using it, it became a label for offensive tools to control nations not complying with the ruling bodies of the world. It was supposed to be connected with the United Nations and alliances like NATO but it evolved into what a small elitist group in the USA and some other nations, thought was good for the world.
Then the term bled into economics, where a new order of "globalization" would create a one size fits all global economy. It was proclaimed a global economy without borders.
Another parallel understanding flowed from a historical interpretation of conspiracies. The most focus pointed to the Council on Foreign Relations where many said were elitist groups forming a ruling class to guide those with less know how. Others maintained that a small well organized elite groups met behind closed doors to sculpture and manipulate public opinion by controlling the news and media channels.
In any event, circumstances surfaced where President Clinton seems to be the "chosen one" to activate a New World Order. President Clinton acted as if he was on the mission of his life to consummate Free Trade and the surge of Globalization. He acted as if he was the point man for the elder President Bush preparing the way for others like President Bush the second to take over. The younger President Bush went out of his way to smash age old conventions related to wars and commerce in an anything goes process with the only exception being a small group of owners of the New World Order. Now it seems, Hillary Clinton stands ready to carry the torch.
President Clinton set the parameters of the New World Order, by proclaiming a statistical prosperity while millions in the USA were losing their jobs. He took on a version of unemployment reporting that did not match up with what was really happening on the streets. The unemployment rate is fiction with about 38 percent of all workers in America not qualifying for unemployment insurance. Clinton led the way during the most massive dislocation of jobs in U.S. history. Local value added economies were chopped up into pieces and shipped around the world. An open door policy with China was not opened in any small way but it was exploded with President Clinton even contributing previously "patented" and "security protected" goods and services to China. The Globalist acted as if Globalization and Free Trade was evolving in a natural economic way. The opposite was true. It was a forced march into a New World Order that has turned into the New World Dis-Order!
President Bush the second followed President Clinton. He matched Clintons footsteps with a extended versions of a anything goes global arena economics and pre-emptive wars to lock on the New World Order. His stride turned into the New World Dis-Order race to the bottom with the de-industrialization of the U.S.A apparently sufficiently completed. He got into branding a war against Terrorism and used the term Shock and Awe to cover many other "sins".
However, the people of the world are now looking at this phenomemon and responsing with a loud NO! South America is leading the way with a Populist front. Populists like Lou Dobbs at CNN are calling for Independents to rise up, maintaining 300 million people in a country like the USA are smarter than just small elitist groups who are trying to run the show.
The bottom line is the workday. Adam Smith held labor as something "sacred" and the core of all societies. The Free Traders ignore this part of Adam Smith but the workers of the world do not. They know only local value added economies in natural balances geopolitical setttings work. They also know something is very wrong when long haul shipping by ocean, air, trucks and rails with all the protective packaging competes with local economies. They also know that the ecology is affected this way and that there is also an economic ecology for the sake of human dignity in the workday. The Free Enterprise system was set in place for both the owners and workers where all can enjoy a decent living. The economic "plantation owners" in a new kind of wage slave trade will not prevail. It is time to put the New World Order in storage and prepare for a new Post-Globalization era, where we establish labor in its rightful place. The workers of the world will have their voice heard now.
(Other resources at Really Long Link
- mobile user friendly version at http://tapsearchnewsmobile.com
Explore the lost worlds in the Globalist Flat World at Really Long Link
- mobile user friendly version at Really Long Link
For workers having no voice in the process of Globalization and Free Trade view the "unnetted" see Really Long Link
| 36 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
Subscribe to this blog
Comment by Howard
Real Crash
Comment by Tapsearch Com Editor
Ethics Box
Stories behind News in Global Economic Arena
The Rationale Quest
Bizarre Politics Free Trade not trade
Art-That-Talks-Bizarre-Politics
bizarre-politics-hotlinks
by Ray Tapajna
" In his Nov.17 letter to the editor, Kevin *********** , says we should get over the past and embrace the future. The past is the future. The examples of the past are the only things we have left to restore human dignity in the workday, a real free-enterprise system and the American dream for all in the world. Local value-added economies are the only things that work. We have chopped up the goose that laid the golden egg and sent the pieces around the world. We have also created a new colonalism that breeds wars and terrorism.
More education will not help if everyone in the world is competing for the same jobs. More research and development won't work if the production phase goes outside the United States. More retail outlets like Wal-Mart will not work, if we shop ourselves out of our jobs.
The United States has gone through the most massive dislocation of jobs in its history, with bankruptcy rates breaking all records. Who said we had to compete in a global economic arena like gladiators?
Have free trade and globalization really evolved in a natural economic way? "
( Feel free to pass on this letter to all interested in restoring the American dream for all in the world. It comes down to numbers- The upper middle class in the USA totals only about 20 million people. This is not enough to support free trade especially when a new working poor class is now the largest group in the economy ) See more at Dysfunctional Globalists with Workers having no voice in the process